Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Sebastian Gima vs Kazuki Nishiwaki Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gima vs Nishiwaki analysis and find out who is favored!
Sebastian Gima vs Kazuki Nishiwaki Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Gima 0 - 0 Nishiwaki
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gima has won 49.37% of points on their second serve, while Nishiwaki has won 44.96%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gima, in recent form, has won 57.35% of their opponent's second serve points, while Nishiwaki has won 47.77%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.83% and 30.75% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gima has saved 59.44% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nishiwaki has saved 58.86% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gima has won 56.63% of matches played (W/L 47/ 36), with Nishiwaki winning 48% (W/L 24/ 26) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gima has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 49/ 31), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 45% (W/L 5/ 6). Nishiwaki has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 55% (W/L 113/ 94), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 29% (W/L 2/ 5).
- Player level: In the last year, Gima has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 59.7% of matches (W/L 40/ 27), where as Nishiwaki has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 24/ 24). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gima has played against opponents with an average rank of 158.55 while Nishiwaki has played against players with an average rank of 180.58.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gima has won 54% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nishiwaki has won 53% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gima has converted 43.26% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nishiwaki has converted 35.96% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
494
Rank
436
High
22
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
665
Rank
608
High
29
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
Form
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
58% (175-125)
Career Total W/L
54% (147-125)
55% (21-17)
YTD W/L
32% (6-13)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Sebastian Gima vs Kazuki Nishiwaki For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Gima VS Nishiwaki
Sportsbook
Offer
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Sebastian Gima | Kazuki Nishiwaki |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 55% (21/17) | 32% (6/13) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 55% (48/40) | 36% (16/28) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (423/387) | 45% (187/230) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 30% (3/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 58% (21/15) | 33% (3/6) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.12 | 0.24 |
| Aces Total | 46 | 48 |
| DFs per game | 0.18 | 0.23 |
| DFs Total | 71 | 46 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:48:23 | 1:34:12 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 145.87 | 135.37 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (1613/2644) | 62% (723/1161) |
| 1st Serve W% | 64% (1040/1613) | 67% (481/723) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (509/1031) | 45% (198/438) |
| BPs Won% Total | 43% (138/319) | 34% (36/107) |
| Return Pts W% | 44% (1187/2726) | 37% (446/1212) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 43% (3/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 58% (18/13) | 32% (6/13) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 54% (20/37) | 33% (6/18) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (4/6) | 33% (2/6) |
| Deciding Set W% | 45% (5/11) | 40% (2/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 90% (21/19) | 56% (9/5) |
| 1st set W, L | 10% (21/2) | 44% (9/4) |
| 1st set L, W | 12% (17/2) | 10% (10/1) |
Sebastian Gima Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Jozef Kovalik
Player
Sebastian Gima
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
61%
(
51 of
84)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
40 of
84)
80
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sebastian Gima
Player
Matej Dodig
55%
(
38 of
69)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
5
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
33%
(
23 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
73
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sebastian Gima
Player
Jonas Forejtek
60%
(
58 of
97)
1st Serve %
58%
(
61 of
106)
6
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
6
81%
(
47 of
58)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
47 of
61)
46%
(
18 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
33%
(
32 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
106)
105
Total Points Won
98
|
7-6(1) 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mirza Basic
Player
Sebastian Gima
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve %
47%
(
22 of
47)
9
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
93%
(
28 of
30)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
24%
(
4 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mihai Razvan Marinescu
Player
Sebastian Gima
64%
(
76 of
119)
1st Serve %
62%
(
51 of
82)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
49%
(
21 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
44%
(
52 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
33 of
82)
100
Total Points Won
101
|
6-4 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sebastian Gima
Player
Vojtech Vales
52%
(
33 of
64)
1st Serve %
63%
(
43 of
68)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
25 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ilya Snitari
Player
Sebastian Gima
51%
(
62 of
122)
1st Serve %
69%
(
77 of
111)
-
Aces
-
7
Double Faults
2
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
45 of
77)
43%
(
26 of
60)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
47%
(
57 of
122)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
52 of
111)
117
Total Points Won
116
|
7-5 2-6 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elliot Benchetrit
Player
Sebastian Gima
60%
(
43 of
72)
1st Serve %
61%
(
65 of
106)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
42 of
65)
69%
(
20 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
15 of
41)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
24 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
49 of
106)
97
Total Points Won
81
|
6-3 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sebastian Gima
Player
Dax Donders
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve %
63%
(
35 of
56)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Niels Lootsma
Player
Sebastian Gima
57%
(
38 of
67)
1st Serve %
61%
(
44 of
72)
3
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
1
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
34%
(
10 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
43%
(
29 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
72)
73
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Kazuki Nishiwaki Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Taiyo Yamanaka
Player
Kazuki Nishiwaki
69%
(
61 of
88)
1st Serve %
69%
(
70 of
102)
3
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
4
80%
(
49 of
61)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
50 of
70)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
22 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
33 of
102)
99
Total Points Won
91
|
6-7(3) 7-6(2) 5-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kazuki Nishiwaki
Player
Tsz Fu Wong
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
64%
(
55 of
86)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
9
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
40 of
86)
77
Total Points Won
65
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ku Keon Kang
Player
Kazuki Nishiwaki
74%
(
67 of
91)
1st Serve %
64%
(
48 of
75)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
37%
(
34 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
75)
88
Total Points Won
78
|
7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ryotaro Matsumura
Player
Kazuki Nishiwaki
47%
(
27 of
58)
1st Serve %
48%
(
25 of
52)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
8
56%
(
15 of
27)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
43%
(
25 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-2 4-6 10-7 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Illya Beloborodko
Player
Kazuki Nishiwaki
59%
(
48 of
81)
1st Serve %
62%
(
56 of
90)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
37 of
56)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
36%
(
29 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
39 of
90)
91
Total Points Won
80
|
3-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kazuki Nishiwaki
Player
Christian Teszari
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve %
76%
(
39 of
51)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
10 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dan Alexandru Tomescu
Player
Kazuki Nishiwaki
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
62%
(
26 of
42)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
60
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-4 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Savva Polukhin
Player
Kazuki Nishiwaki
54%
(
19 of
35)
1st Serve %
55%
(
35 of
64)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
89%
(
17 of
19)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
23%
(
8 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
37 of
64)
64
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Gima Vs Nishiwaki Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Gima are available here and Nishiwaki photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
